Who are we? On rorty, rhetoric, and politics

Giorgio Baruchello, Ralph Weber

Rannsóknarafurð: Framlag til fræðitímaritsGreinritrýni

2 Tilvitnanir (Scopus)

Útdráttur

It is not unusual to think of Rortys work as a success in rhetoric and a failure in political philosophy. In this article we re-evaluate this assessment by analyzing a typical feature of Rortys writing: his frequent use of "we so-and-so." Taking stock of the existing literature on the subject we discuss how Rortys use of the "we" was received by peers and how he himself made sense of it. We then analyze Rortys oeuvre in order to show that a better understanding of his rhetorical "we" could make his politico-philosophical "we" more appealing. We suggest that Rortys pragmatist take on "ethnos" is preferable to other notions that are currently championed in political theory and philosophy.

Upprunalegt tungumálEnska
Síður (frá-til)197-214
Síðufjöldi18
FræðitímaritEuropean Legacy
Bindi19
Númer tölublaðs2
DOI
ÚtgáfustaðaÚtgefið - 23 feb. 2014

Önnur efnisorð

  • Rhetoric
  • Philosophy
  • Politics

Fingerprint

Sökktu þér í rannsóknarefni „Who are we? On rorty, rhetoric, and politics“. Saman myndar þetta einstakt fingrafar.

Vitna í þetta