5-Year Outcomes of PCI Guided by Measurement of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve

Matthias Götberg, Karolina Berntorp, Rebecca Rylance, Evald H. Christiansen, Troels Yndigegn, Ingibjörg Jóna Guðmundsdóttir, Sasha Koul, Lennart Sandhall, Mikael Danielewicz, Lars Jakobsen, Sven Erik Olsson, Hans Olsson, Elmir Omerovic, Fredrik Calais, Pontus Lindroos, Michael Maeng, Dimitrios Venetsanos, Stefan K. James, Amra Kåregren, Jörg CarlssonJens Jensen, Ann Charlotte Karlsson, David Erlinge, Ole Fröbert

Rannsóknarafurð: Framlag til fræðitímaritsGreinritrýni

1 Tilvitnun (Scopus)

Útdráttur

Background: Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a coronary physiology index used to assess the severity of coronary artery stenosis to guide revascularization. iFR has previously demonstrated noninferior short-term outcome compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR), but data on longer-term outcome have been lacking. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prespecified 5-year follow-up of the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization of the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial comparing iFR vs FFR in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes. Methods: iFR-SWEDEHEART was a multicenter, controlled, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial using the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry for enrollment. A total of 2,037 patients were randomized to undergo revascularization guided by iFR or FFR. Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. At 5 years, the rate of the primary composite endpoint was 21.5% in the iFR group and 19.9% in the FFR group (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.90-1.33). The rates of all-cause death (9.4% vs 7.9%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.89-1.62), nonfatal myocardial infarction (5.7% vs 5.8%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.70-1.44), and unplanned revascularization (11.6% vs 11.3%; HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.79-1.32) were also not different between the 2 groups. The outcomes were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Conclusions: In patients with chronic or acute coronary syndromes, an iFR-guided revascularization strategy was associated with no difference in the 5-year composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization compared with an FFR-guided revascularization strategy. (Evaluation of iFR vs FFR in Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome [iFR SWEDEHEART]; NCT02166736)

Upprunalegt tungumálEnska
Síður (frá-til)965-974
Síðufjöldi10
FræðitímaritJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Bindi79
Númer tölublaðs10
DOI
ÚtgáfustaðaÚtgefið - 15 mar. 2022

Athugasemd

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Fingerprint

Sökktu þér í rannsóknarefni „5-Year Outcomes of PCI Guided by Measurement of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve“. Saman myndar þetta einstakt fingrafar.

Vitna í þetta