Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant-supported multi-unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area

Bjarni E. Pjetursson*, Irena Sailer, Elizabeth Merino-Higuera, Benedikt Christopher Spies, Felix Burkhardt, Duygu Karasan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of the study were to assess the survival, failure, and technical complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (iFDPs) with pontic or splinted crown (iSpC) designs in the posterior area and compare the influence of prosthetic materials and prosthetic design on the outcomes. Methods: Electronic and manual searches were performed to identify randomized-, prospective-, and retrospective clinical trials with follow-up time of ≥12 months, evaluating the clinical outcomes of posterior iFDPs with pontic or iSpCs. Survival and complication rates were analyzed using robust Poisson's regression models. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 42 study arms were included in the present systematic review. The meta-analysis of the included studies indicated estimated 3-year survival rates of 98.3% (95%CI: 95.6–99.3%) for porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) iFDPs, 97.5% (95%CI: 95.5–98.7%) for veneered zirconia (Zr) iFDPs with pontic, 98.9% (95%CI: 96.8–99.6%) for monolithic or micro-veneered zirconia iFDPs with pontic, and 97.0% (95%CI: 84.8–99.9%) for lithium disilicate iFDPs with pontics. The survival rates for different material combination showed no statistically significant differences. Veneered restorations, overall, showed significantly (p <.01) higher ceramic fracture and chipping rates compared with monolithic restorations. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in survival rates (98.3% [95%CI: 95.6–99.3%] vs. 99.1% [95%CI: 97.6–99.7%]) and overall complication rates between PFM iFDPs with pontic and PFM iSpCs. Conclusions: Based on the data identified by this systematic review, PFM, veneered Zr, and monolithic Zr iFDPs with pontic and iSpCs showed similarly high short-term survival rates in the posterior area. Veneered restorations exhibit ceramic chipping more often than monolithic restorations, with the highest fracture rate reported for veneered Zr iFDPs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-103
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume34 Suppl 26
Issue numberS26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Other keywords

  • ceramics
  • dental crown
  • dental implants
  • fixed bridge
  • implant-supported dental prosthesis
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic review
  • zirconia
  • Prospective Studies
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
  • Ceramics
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Zirconium
  • Crowns
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant-supported multi-unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this