Spatial nature of urban well-being

Sanna Ala-Mantila, Jukka Heinonen, Seppo Junnila, Perttu Saarsalmi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)


The evidence for connections between subjective well-being and spatial factors remains inconclusive, especially with respect to the immediate living environment. To fill this gap, this paper explores the relationship between individual-level subjective well-being and spatial variables in urban areas. This resolution is achieved by utilizing finely divided geographical information system (GIS)-based neighbourhood data, and controlling for objective and subjective spatial characteristics, as well as socio-spatial factors. The results suggest that subjective well-being has some spatial nature, but the direction of these relationships is highly dependent on the subjective well-being measure used. For example, central pedestrian zones flourish in terms of quality of life, whereas the highest happiness is reported in car-oriented zones. Overall, subjective spatial characteristics are more important for well-being than objective ones.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)959-973
JournalRegional Studies
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2017

Other keywords

  • Subjective well-being
  • Cities
  • Happiness
  • Quality of life
  • Inequality
  • Urbanization
  • Borgir
  • Hamingja
  • Þéttbýlismyndun


Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial nature of urban well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this