TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation dose reduction in computed skeletal radiography
T2 - Effect on image quality
AU - Jónsson, Á
AU - Herrlin, K.
AU - Jonsson, K.
AU - Lundin, B.
AU - Sanfridsson, J.
AU - Pettersson, H.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality in computed musculoskeletal radiography and determine optimal exposure range. Material and Methods: In 11 corpses, 1 hand and 1 hip were examined with film-screen radiography, and a series of computed radiographs was obtained using exactly the same technique except for the exposure, which was 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 1.56% of the mAs numbers used for the film-screen images. The computed hip radiographs were processed in 2 different ways, one simulating the film-screen images and one using contrast enhancement. Four radiologists reviewed the images regarding the following parameters: cortical bone, trabecular bone, joint space, and soft tissue, giving each a diagnostic quality rating on a scale from 1 to 5. The median and mean values were found for the pooled results. Results: For the hands, the computed radiographs were ranked inferior to the film-screen images for all parameters except soft tissue, where the computed radiographs scored higher. The computed images with 50 and 25% exposure were ranked equal to the 100% ones. The quality rating slowly declined with lower exposures. For the hips, the 100 and 50% computed radiographs were generally similar to or slightly better than the film-screen images. The decline was somewhat faster than for the hands. The contrast-enhanced hip images scored less than the nonenhanced images at any given exposure for all parameters except soft tissue, where the contrast-enhanced images scored better at all exposures. The difference between nonenhanced and enhanced images became less at the lower exposures. Conclusion: Lowering the exposure in computed musculoskeletal radiography below the level of film-screen radiography is feasible, especially in the peripheral skeleton. Contrast enhancement seems to be valuable only in the evaluation of soft-tissue structures.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality in computed musculoskeletal radiography and determine optimal exposure range. Material and Methods: In 11 corpses, 1 hand and 1 hip were examined with film-screen radiography, and a series of computed radiographs was obtained using exactly the same technique except for the exposure, which was 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 1.56% of the mAs numbers used for the film-screen images. The computed hip radiographs were processed in 2 different ways, one simulating the film-screen images and one using contrast enhancement. Four radiologists reviewed the images regarding the following parameters: cortical bone, trabecular bone, joint space, and soft tissue, giving each a diagnostic quality rating on a scale from 1 to 5. The median and mean values were found for the pooled results. Results: For the hands, the computed radiographs were ranked inferior to the film-screen images for all parameters except soft tissue, where the computed radiographs scored higher. The computed images with 50 and 25% exposure were ranked equal to the 100% ones. The quality rating slowly declined with lower exposures. For the hips, the 100 and 50% computed radiographs were generally similar to or slightly better than the film-screen images. The decline was somewhat faster than for the hands. The contrast-enhanced hip images scored less than the nonenhanced images at any given exposure for all parameters except soft tissue, where the contrast-enhanced images scored better at all exposures. The difference between nonenhanced and enhanced images became less at the lower exposures. Conclusion: Lowering the exposure in computed musculoskeletal radiography below the level of film-screen radiography is feasible, especially in the peripheral skeleton. Contrast enhancement seems to be valuable only in the evaluation of soft-tissue structures.
KW - Computer-assisted
KW - Experimental
KW - Image quality
KW - Musculoskeletal
KW - Radiation dose
KW - Radiography, digital
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030097091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02841859609173431
DO - 10.1080/02841859609173431
M3 - Article
C2 - 8600948
AN - SCOPUS:0030097091
SN - 0284-1851
VL - 37
SP - 128
EP - 133
JO - Acta Radiologica
JF - Acta Radiologica
IS - 2
ER -