Public committees and corporatism: How does Iceland compare to Scandinavia?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper compares the number of corporatist public committees, appointed by central government, in Iceland and Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, Sweden). Its main aim is to shed light on where Iceland stands compared to these countries in term of corporatist practices. Scholars view corporatist public committees as the core expression of Scandinavian corporatism and thus well suited for the measurement of corporatism. This study shows that the functional representational channel is an important feature of Icelandic democracy. In Iceland various interest groups are integrated into the democratic process of decision-making and implementation in an institutionalized and privileged manner. This is the essence of corporatism, defined as the institutionalized and privileged integration of organized interests in the preparation and/or implementation of public policies. Moreover, the results show that Iceland is today much more corporatist than the Scandinavian countries; especially, in terms of preparatory corporatism. Already in 1970, it appears that Iceland was more corporatist than Sweden in terms of the number of corporatist committees. The paper also sheds light on sectoral corporatism in Iceland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-188
JournalIcelandic Review of Politics & Administration
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2018

Other keywords

  • Public committees
  • Corporatism
  • Democracy
  • Policy-making
  • Nefndarstörf
  • Lýðfræði
  • Stefnumótun
  • Hagsmunasamtök


Dive into the research topics of 'Public committees and corporatism: How does Iceland compare to Scandinavia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this