Personality predictors of self-reported offending in Icelandic students

Gisli H. Gudjonsson*, Emil Einarsson, Ólafur Örn Bragason, Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-reported offending and personality. A total of 1603 students in further education in Iceland completed the Mak Self-Reported Delinquency Scale as well as a number of psychological tests, namely the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ and IVE), the Gough Socialisation Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Gudjonsson Compliance Scale. Multiple regression analyses showed that five out of the 10 individual personality scales contributed 27 and 30 per cent to self-reported offending for males and females, respectively. Overall, the Gough Socialisation Scale and EPQ psychoticism contributed most to the variance in self-reported offending, but impulsivity, extraversion and a low lie score also added significantly to the variance after interactions among the personality measures had been taken into account. Some gender differences emerged with impulsivity being a better predictor of offending among the males than females. Overall, the findings give strong support for the hypothesis that personality, particularly those relating to antisocial personality traits, is significantly related to self-reported offending in both males and females.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-393
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology, Crime and Law
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

Other keywords

  • Gender differences
  • Impulsivity
  • Personality
  • Self-reported offending
  • Socialisation
  • Socialization
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Borderline Personality Disorder
  • Students
  • Psychological Tests

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personality predictors of self-reported offending in Icelandic students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this