TY - JOUR
T1 - Nature tourism assessment in the icelandic master plan for geothermal and hydropower development. Part I
T2 - Rapid evaluation of nature tourism resources
AU - Sæþórsdóttir, Anna Dóra
AU - Ólafsson, Rögnvaldur
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The Icelandic government is currently carrying out a project called Master Plan for geothermal and hydropower development where all major potential hydropower and geothermal power plant projects in Iceland are being evaluated and ranked. One part of the project is to evaluate the effects of the power plants on tourism and recreation. In this paper, the method developed for this purpose is presented where the value of tourist destinations is evaluated. The country was divided into 57 tourism regions. A group of 8 specialists was asked to evaluate 43 attributes that were considered important for tourism and recreation and rank the tourism regions. The relevant regions have very different properties which make it difficult to select attributes that are relevant in all regions. This was overcome by using a large common set of attributes, but only taking into the total score in each region the score for the attributes that get the highest scores. In this way, the attributes important in each region are identified and compose the score for the present value of each tourism region.
AB - The Icelandic government is currently carrying out a project called Master Plan for geothermal and hydropower development where all major potential hydropower and geothermal power plant projects in Iceland are being evaluated and ranked. One part of the project is to evaluate the effects of the power plants on tourism and recreation. In this paper, the method developed for this purpose is presented where the value of tourist destinations is evaluated. The country was divided into 57 tourism regions. A group of 8 specialists was asked to evaluate 43 attributes that were considered important for tourism and recreation and rank the tourism regions. The relevant regions have very different properties which make it difficult to select attributes that are relevant in all regions. This was overcome by using a large common set of attributes, but only taking into the total score in each region the score for the attributes that get the highest scores. In this way, the attributes important in each region are identified and compose the score for the present value of each tourism region.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Highlands
KW - Nature tourism resources
KW - Planning
KW - Power plants
KW - Wilderness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855432234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1743873X.2010.517839
DO - 10.1080/1743873X.2010.517839
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84855432234
SN - 1743-873X
VL - 5
SP - 311
EP - 331
JO - Journal of Heritage Tourism
JF - Journal of Heritage Tourism
IS - 4
ER -