Measuring and regulating extreme risk

Ulf Nielsson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss two important extensions to the well-known value-at-risk (VaR) methodology, namely extreme value theory (EVT) and expected shortfall (ES). Both of these extensions address the weaknesses of VaR, in particular the methodology’s tendency to systematically underestimate risk of extreme market events. Design/methodology/approach - The theory of VaR and the two extensions are reviewed and the methodology is evaluated in light of the Basel II regulatory framework that calls for the use of VaR by financial institutions. Findings - The paper clarifies the use of VaR and its extensions to make practitioners more aware of the pitfalls and how to address them. It is recommended that the two extended measures of extreme event risk (i.e. EVT and ES) be included into every risk manager’s information pool. Originality/value - A compact review of these approaches and their regulatory connection has not previously been compiled. This review is of particular value to risk managers and policy markers given the turbulent market conditions of the past year.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-171
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Other keywords

  • Financial risk
  • Regulation
  • Risk analysis


Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring and regulating extreme risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this