Is the presentation of a theory sufficient to justify publication? Would Einstein have been published in ophthalmology?

Einar Stefánsson^*, Frank Holz

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	715-716
Number of pages	2
Journal	Acta Ophthalmologica
Volume	88
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02031.x
Publication status	Published - Nov 2010

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02031.x

Cite this

@article{984dcf40fa4e4f989e65a7793b831a65,

title = "Is the presentation of a theory sufficient to justify publication? Would Einstein have been published in ophthalmology?",

author = "Einar Stef{\'a}nsson and Frank Holz",

year = "2010",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02031.x",

language = "English",

volume = "88",

pages = "715--716",

journal = "Acta Ophthalmologica",

issn = "1755-375X",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the presentation of a theory sufficient to justify publication? Would Einstein have been published in ophthalmology?

AU - Stefánsson, Einar

AU - Holz, Frank

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349252700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02031.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02031.x

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 20977695

AN - SCOPUS:78349252700

SN - 1755-375X

VL - 88

SP - 715

EP - 716

JO - Acta Ophthalmologica

JF - Acta Ophthalmologica

IS - 7

ER -