TY - GEN
T1 - Iris-sensor authentication using camera PRNU fingerprints
AU - Uhl, Andreas
AU - Höller, Yvonne
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Integrity and authenticity are important issues in biometrics security. Digital image forensics have shown that the integrity and authenticity of an image can be evidenced by a specific sensor fingerprint. If an image contains the sensor fingerprint it is assumed to be truly taken by that sensor. In such a way, an image can be authenticated by identifying it's sensor. However, this fingerprint may be forged. We calculated the photo response non uniformity (PRNU) as sensor fingerprint and estimated how well it differentiates iris scans of the CASIA V4 iris-sensors. The distinction rate varies largely between the sensors, with equal error rates between 0.21 and 23.26%. By inserting a fingerprint of one sensor into iris-scans of another sensor we successfully forged several iris scans. This forgery required estimating the best embedding-strength for the fingerprint, and we present a useful heuristic to do so. The triangle test is proposed as a countermeasure against this attack. However, it was shown not to be very effective. This could be explained by the fact that the quality of a sensor fingerprint determines if a forgery may be detectable or not by the triangle test. It is possible that the special content of the images limits the applicability of the PRNU, its forgery and the detection of the forgery in iris databases.
AB - Integrity and authenticity are important issues in biometrics security. Digital image forensics have shown that the integrity and authenticity of an image can be evidenced by a specific sensor fingerprint. If an image contains the sensor fingerprint it is assumed to be truly taken by that sensor. In such a way, an image can be authenticated by identifying it's sensor. However, this fingerprint may be forged. We calculated the photo response non uniformity (PRNU) as sensor fingerprint and estimated how well it differentiates iris scans of the CASIA V4 iris-sensors. The distinction rate varies largely between the sensors, with equal error rates between 0.21 and 23.26%. By inserting a fingerprint of one sensor into iris-scans of another sensor we successfully forged several iris scans. This forgery required estimating the best embedding-strength for the fingerprint, and we present a useful heuristic to do so. The triangle test is proposed as a countermeasure against this attack. However, it was shown not to be very effective. This could be explained by the fact that the quality of a sensor fingerprint determines if a forgery may be detectable or not by the triangle test. It is possible that the special content of the images limits the applicability of the PRNU, its forgery and the detection of the forgery in iris databases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866775739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICB.2012.6199813
DO - 10.1109/ICB.2012.6199813
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84866775739
SN - 9781467303941
T3 - Proceedings - 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics, ICB 2012
SP - 230
EP - 237
BT - Proceedings - 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics, ICB 2012
T2 - 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics, ICB 2012
Y2 - 29 March 2012 through 1 April 2012
ER -