Health care-related predictors of husbands' preparedness for the death of a wife to cancer-A population-based follow-up

A. Hauksdóttir*, U. Valdimarsdóttir, C. J. Fürst, E. Onelöv, G. Steineck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: If we can learn how to increase preparedness before the death of a loved one, we can possibly decrease the next-of-kin's long-term morbidity. Methods: In a population-based study, 691 of 907 (76%) men in Sweden who lost a wife to cancer 4-5 years earlier answered an anonymous questionnaire about their preparedness at the time of their wife's death as well as potential predictors for preparedness. Results: A final logistic regression model indicates following predictors for preparedness, among others: the length of the widower's intellectual awareness time before his wife's death [relative risk (RR) 4.1, confidence interval (CI) 2.7-6.1], the widower could take in the information that his wife's disease could not be cured (RR 3.5, CI 2.3-5.2), the couple had arranged their economical affairs (RR 1.5, CI 1.3-1.7), the wife had stayed at a palliative care unit during her last months of life (RR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.4) and health care personnel supported the husband to participate in his wife's care (RR 1.6, CI 1.3-2.1). Conclusions: We identified several care-related factors that may influence the preparedness of men before their wife's death to cancer. These factors can be considered in future intervention studies aiming at influencing preparedness before the death of a loved one.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-361
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Other keywords

  • Bereavement
  • Population based
  • Predictors
  • Preparedness
  • Widowers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health care-related predictors of husbands' preparedness for the death of a wife to cancer-A population-based follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this