TY - JOUR
T1 - Early discharge and home intervention reduces unit costs after total hip replacement
T2 - Results of a cost analysis in a randomized study
AU - Sigurdsson, Eyjolfur
AU - Siggeirsdottir, Kristin
AU - Jonsson, Halldor
AU - Gudnason, Vilmundur
AU - Matthiasson, Thorolfur
AU - Jonsson, Brynjolfur Y.
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Total hip replacement (THR) is a common and costly procedure. The number of THR is expected to increase over the coming years. Two pathways of postoperative treatment were compared in a randomized study. Fifty patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team. A control group (CG) of 23 patients received 'conventional' rehabilitation augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center if needed. All costs for the two groups both in hospitals and after discharge were collected and analyzed. On average total costs for the SG were $8,550 and $11,952 for the CG, a 28% cost reduction. Total inpatient costs were $5,225 for the SG and $6,515 for the CG. In a regression analysis the group difference is statistically significant. Adjusting for changes in the Oxford Hip Score gives effective costs (C/E). The ratio of the SGs C/E to the CGs is 0.60. That is a cost-effectiveness gain of 40%. A shorter hospital stay augmented with better preoperative education and home treatment appears to be more effective and costs less than the traditional in hospital pathway of treatment.
AB - Total hip replacement (THR) is a common and costly procedure. The number of THR is expected to increase over the coming years. Two pathways of postoperative treatment were compared in a randomized study. Fifty patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team. A control group (CG) of 23 patients received 'conventional' rehabilitation augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center if needed. All costs for the two groups both in hospitals and after discharge were collected and analyzed. On average total costs for the SG were $8,550 and $11,952 for the CG, a 28% cost reduction. Total inpatient costs were $5,225 for the SG and $6,515 for the CG. In a regression analysis the group difference is statistically significant. Adjusting for changes in the Oxford Hip Score gives effective costs (C/E). The ratio of the SGs C/E to the CGs is 0.60. That is a cost-effectiveness gain of 40%. A shorter hospital stay augmented with better preoperative education and home treatment appears to be more effective and costs less than the traditional in hospital pathway of treatment.
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - Home intervention
KW - Total hip replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48449101308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10754-008-9036-0
DO - 10.1007/s10754-008-9036-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 18566886
AN - SCOPUS:48449101308
SN - 1389-6563
VL - 8
SP - 181
EP - 192
JO - International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics
JF - International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics
IS - 3
ER -