Early discharge and home intervention reduces unit costs after total hip replacement: Results of a cost analysis in a randomized study

Eyjolfur Sigurdsson*, Kristin Siggeirsdottir, Halldor Jonsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Thorolfur Matthiasson, Brynjolfur Y. Jonsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is a common and costly procedure. The number of THR is expected to increase over the coming years. Two pathways of postoperative treatment were compared in a randomized study. Fifty patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team. A control group (CG) of 23 patients received 'conventional' rehabilitation augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center if needed. All costs for the two groups both in hospitals and after discharge were collected and analyzed. On average total costs for the SG were $8,550 and $11,952 for the CG, a 28% cost reduction. Total inpatient costs were $5,225 for the SG and $6,515 for the CG. In a regression analysis the group difference is statistically significant. Adjusting for changes in the Oxford Hip Score gives effective costs (C/E). The ratio of the SGs C/E to the CGs is 0.60. That is a cost-effectiveness gain of 40%. A shorter hospital stay augmented with better preoperative education and home treatment appears to be more effective and costs less than the traditional in hospital pathway of treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-192
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2008

Other keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Home intervention
  • Total hip replacement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early discharge and home intervention reduces unit costs after total hip replacement: Results of a cost analysis in a randomized study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this