Decompression boiling and natural steam cap formation in high-enthalpy geothermal systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many high-enthalpy geothermal systems exhibit vapor-rich boiling zones at shallow depths (<1 km), commonly known as steam caps. While the spatial extent and vapor content of steam caps often increases in response to fluid extraction and subsequent pressure decline, the geologic factors controlling steam cap formation and development are poorly understood. Numerical simulations of groundwater convection driven by a transiently cooling intrusion elucidate a natural mechanism by which steam caps can develop from initially liquid-dominated boiling zones. In the simulations, intensive decompression boiling and steam cap development occurs after the heat of a subsurface magmatic intrusion is exhausted by prolonged hydrothermal convection. A reduction in the strength of the upflow leads to a fluid pressure decrease of 2–4 MPa in boiling zones beneath an impermeable cap rock. As the vertical pressure gradient decreases, approaching vapor-static, zones of liquid-vapor counterflow (i.e., heat pipes) develop at the base of steam caps, efficiently isolating overlying vapor-rich zones from underlying liquid. The reservoir rock permeability and the cap rock thickness are main controls on the enthalpy and spatial extent of steam caps, with thicker and higher enthalpy (potentially superheated) steam caps developing in intermediate permeability reservoir rocks (∼ 10−15 m2). Due to the importance of transient changes in geothermal system structure to steam cap development, the dynamics of natural steam cap formation may not be captured in standard approaches to natural state reservoir modeling, which express the role of the heat source in terms of fixed boundary conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106765
JournalJournal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Volume395
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author is funded by Technical Development Fund of the Research Center of Iceland ( RANNÍS - grant number 175193-0612 Data Fusion for Geothermal Reservoir Characterization). The numerical simulations were performed during the authors PhD studies at ETH Zurich between 2012–2016, which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (CRSII2 141843/1 , Sinergia COTHERM). Special thanks to the CSMP++ developers community and to William Cumming for stimulating discussions. The CSMP++ platform is subject to licensing through ETH Zurich, Heriot Watt University, and Montanuniversitat Leoben. An early version of this work was presented at the Geothermal Resources Council annual meeting in 2019 ( Scott, 2019 ). The comments of two anonymous reviewers led to significant improvements in the manuscript.

Funding Information:
The author is funded by Technical Development Fund of the Research Center of Iceland (RANN?S - grant number 175193-0612 Data Fusion for Geothermal Reservoir Characterization). The numerical simulations were performed during the authors PhD studies at ETH Zurich between 2012?2016, which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (CRSII2 141843/1, Sinergia COTHERM). Special thanks to the CSMP++ developers community and to William Cumming for stimulating discussions. The CSMP++ platform is subject to licensing through ETH Zurich, Heriot Watt University, and Montanuniversitat Leoben. An early version of this work was presented at the Geothermal Resources Council annual meeting in 2019 (Scott, 2019). The comments of two anonymous reviewers led to significant improvements in the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Other keywords

  • Boiling
  • High-enthalpy geothermal systems
  • Numerical modeling
  • Permeability
  • Steam cap

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decompression boiling and natural steam cap formation in high-enthalpy geothermal systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this