TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical Election in the Wake of an Economic and Political Crisis
T2 - Realignment of Icelandic Party Voters?
AU - Önnudóttir, Eva H.
AU - Schmitt, Hermann
AU - Harðarson, Ólafur
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Nordic Political Science Association
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - A critical election is generally defined as one in which the decisive results of voting reveal a sharp alternation of pre-existing cleavage(s) and voting patterns, and the dealignment or realignment made between parties is lasting. A critical election can be caused by various factors and in this article the authors analyse whether the global credit crunch in 2008 set things in motion in Iceland, resulting in the 2009 election as a critical election. In that election, the electoral relevance of voters’ psychological attachment to parties and of ideological distances to them weakened, whereas party competence perceptions increased in importance for vote choices. Attachment to parties and ideological distances are factors that are generally stable and change slowly over time, while party competence is influenced by which issues are of importance at the time of the election. This indicates that, in 2009, a restructuring of the determinants of the vote occurred; a pattern of changes that is typical for a critical election. Evidence is found that the importance of party sympathy increases again in the 2013 election, indicating a realignment, rather than a dealignment, occurring in the wake of the 2009 election.
AB - A critical election is generally defined as one in which the decisive results of voting reveal a sharp alternation of pre-existing cleavage(s) and voting patterns, and the dealignment or realignment made between parties is lasting. A critical election can be caused by various factors and in this article the authors analyse whether the global credit crunch in 2008 set things in motion in Iceland, resulting in the 2009 election as a critical election. In that election, the electoral relevance of voters’ psychological attachment to parties and of ideological distances to them weakened, whereas party competence perceptions increased in importance for vote choices. Attachment to parties and ideological distances are factors that are generally stable and change slowly over time, while party competence is influenced by which issues are of importance at the time of the election. This indicates that, in 2009, a restructuring of the determinants of the vote occurred; a pattern of changes that is typical for a critical election. Evidence is found that the importance of party sympathy increases again in the 2013 election, indicating a realignment, rather than a dealignment, occurring in the wake of the 2009 election.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995959431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9477.12085
DO - 10.1111/1467-9477.12085
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84995959431
SN - 0080-6757
VL - 40
SP - 157
EP - 181
JO - Scandinavian Political Studies
JF - Scandinavian Political Studies
IS - 2
ER -