Can a single short-term mechanism account for priming of pop-out?

Wouter Kruijne*, Jan W. Brascamp, Árni Kristjánsson, Martijn Meeter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trial-to-trial feature repetition speeds response times in pop-out visual search tasks. These priming effects are often ascribed to a short-term memory system. Recently, however, it has been reported that a 'build-up' sequence of repetitions could facilitate responses over 16 trials later - well beyond twice the typically reported time course (Vision Research, 2011, 51, 1972-1978). Here, we first report two replication attempts that yielded little to no support for such long-term priming of pop-out. The results instead fell in line with the predictions of a previously proposed computational model that describes priming as short-lived facilitation that decays over approximately eight trials (Vision Research, 2010, 50, 2110-2115). In the second part of this study, we show that these data are consistent with a simple formulation of decay with a single timescale, and that there is no significant priming beyond eight trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalVision Research
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
MM is supported by a VIDI Grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). JB is supported by a VENI Grant from NWO. AK is supported by the Erasmus program, the Icelandic Research Council (RANNIS) and the research fund of the University of Iceland .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Other keywords

  • Attention
  • Implicit memory
  • Kernel analysis
  • Priming of pop-out
  • Visual search

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can a single short-term mechanism account for priming of pop-out?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this