Applying the proportionality principle to COVID-19 antibody testing

H. D. Gunnarsdóttir*, M. S. Sinha, S. Gerke, T. Minssen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the globe, many nations have started to relax stringent restrictions in an effort to restart the economy. While Member States of the European Union have approached reopening without the use of antibody testing for COVID-19, such testing may be central to a long-Term, sustainable strategy for international travel, employment, and the allocation and monitoring of vaccines. As the use of antibody testing to dictate the enjoyment of individual freedom remains highly controversial, we describe its use in the context of three case studies (return to the workplace, travel and vaccination), applying the substantive legal balancing entailed in the proportionality principle. Differential treatment of individuals based on COVID-19 antibody test results can be justified through the proportionality principle, which offers a sound dividing line between a reasonable and legitimate response and an unjust and discriminatory response.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Law and the Biosciences
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

Other keywords

  • antibody testing
  • civil rights
  • COVID-19
  • proportionality
  • vaccines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying the proportionality principle to COVID-19 antibody testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this