Abstract
This article presents the findings of a study on the development of case assignment in Icelandic as a second language within the context of Processability Theory (PT) and compares them with previous PT studies on the development of case in L2 German, Russian, and Serbian. We argue that initially, learners are only able to appropriately mark subjects and objects in canonical positions (e.g., subjnom v objacc). Later they are also able to mark arguments with the appropriate case in sentences that deviate from canonical word order (e.g., objacc/dat v subjnom). In order to examine the case development in L2 Icelandic, 148 learners were asked to fill in the blanks of sentences with missing core arguments. Our results replicate for the most part the previous findings for L2 German, Russian, and Serbian. As such, the present study adds to the typological plausibility of PT as a framework that predicts and explains developmental sequences.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 68-98 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | LIA Language, Interaction and Acquisition |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Jun 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© John Benjamins Publishing Company 2020.
Other keywords
- Functional case marking
- Icelandic case system
- L2 case acquisition
- Positional case marking
- Processability Theory