A Gricean Theory of Malaprops

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)


Gricean intentionalists hold that what a speaker says and means by a linguistic utterance is determined by the speaker's communicative intention. On this view, one cannot really say anything without meaning it as well. Conventionalists argue, however, that malapropisms provide powerful counterexamples to this claim. I present two arguments against the conventionalist and sketch a new Gricean theory of speech errors, called the misarticulation theory. On this view, malapropisms are understood as a special case of mispronunciation. I argue that the Gricean theory is supported by empirical work in phonetics and phonology and, also, that conventionalism inevitably fails to do this work justice. I conclude, from this, that the conventionalist fails to show that malapropisms constitute a counterexample to a Gricean theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-462
JournalMind & Language
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2017

Other keywords

  • Faultless Disagreement
  • Truth conditions
  • Recanati
  • Rökfræði
  • Hljóðkerfisfræði


Dive into the research topics of 'A Gricean Theory of Malaprops'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this